The Bench Warmers:

By Rob C.

Art by

TL;DR: The current Supreme Court is the final stage of a decades-long, dark-money conspiracy to replace our popular democracy with an oligarchy. From stealing the 2000 election in Bush v. Gore to gutting voting rights under the pretext of “voter fraud” (which is about as real as the Easter Bunny), the Court has systematically paved the way for the ultimate legal absurdity: the “Imperial Presidency”—an immune-from-prosecution dictator. This isn’t law; it’s a slow-moving, dark-money coup.

The conspiracy to dismantle American democracy didn’t start with a gold-plated elevator or a late-night Truth Social rant; it started in a courtroom, wrapped in judicial robes.

The real patient zero for our current constitutional sickness was Bush v. Gore (2000). In a spectacular act of judicial activism—the very thing “conservatives” claim to despise—a 5-4 majority of the Rehnquist Court invented a novel application of the Equal Protection Clause to halt a recount and install George W. Bush as president. It was the moment the public saw the Court as what it truly is: a political weapon. Justice John Paul Stevens, in his searing dissent, noted, “Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner... the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” They stole an election through court fiat, and they never looked back.

Subscribe now

The Architect of the Monarchy

This legal destruction didn’t happen by accident. It was the meticulously planned work of an ideological machine, driven by a man named Leonard Leo and his network of dark-money groups.

Leo is the co-chairman and longtime executive VP of the Federalist Society, the organization that provides the certified, pre-approved list of right-wing ideologues for the bench. The Federalist Society, far from being a simple “debating society,” is the pipeline for the slow-moving coup. It’s the central hub of a conservative legal network that originated, in part, from the Council for National Policy (CNP), a secretive umbrella organization for high-level conservative and libertarian donors and activists.

This network has spent hundreds of millions of dark dollars to install judges whose primary loyalty is not to the Constitution, but to the manufactured doctrines of “Originalism” and the “Unitary Executive Theory.”

“Originalism” is the bullshit theory that the Constitution must be interpreted exactly as 18th-century slave-owning landowners intended. It’s a convenient, made-up doctrine used to justify gutting environmental protections, civil rights, and reproductive freedom, all while magically expanding presidential and corporate power beyond anything the Founders could have possibly imagined.

The Long, Racist March Against Voting

To cement their oligarchy, they must eliminate the threat of popular democracy. The Court has been happy to oblige.

The long, cynical war against voting rights is fought under the ridiculous, made-up pretext of “voter fraud.” This is a political phantom, a lie repeated so often that the faithful now believe it. Actual, in-person voter fraud is less common than being struck by lightning. Yet, the Court’s right-wing majority has used this pretext to uphold laws that disproportionately suppress the vote of Black and brown citizens and young voters.

The high point of this effort was the infamous 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder, where the Court gutted the pre-clearance formula of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Chief Justice John Roberts argued that the formula was based on “decades-old data” and was no longer necessary. Since that decision, states have raced to enact precisely the kind of restrictive voting laws the VRA was designed to stop. The result is the systematic gutting of voting rights—the removal of the foundation of a fair election—all done under the benign cover of “judicial restraint.”

The Absurd Climax: Immunity for a King

This decades-long judicial stacking has now led to the absurd climax: the invention of the Imperial Presidency.

In a stunning 6-3 decision in Trump v. United States, the Court ruled that a former President is entitled to presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts.” This creates a system where the President is essentially a king above the law.

As Justice Sotomayor wrote in her absolutely necessary dissent, the ruling means that a President who “admits to having ordered the assassinations of his political rivals or critics” would have a “fair shot at getting immunity.” The entire premise flies in the face of the Founders, who designed the office specifically without monarchical immunity.

The ultimate, turd-flavored irony is that this right-wing court now gets to decide what constitutes an “official act” and what constitutes “personal corruption.” They have given themselves the final, exclusive power to determine the lawfulness of the executive branch’s actions, functionally consolidating all power into the hands of the very ideological machine that put them there.

It’s time to inform people of the facts: the Supreme Court is not an impartial arbiter of the law. It is the most powerful weapon in the hands of an oligarchy determined to replace our democracy with a political system where the rules are written by and for the wealthy and the powerful. We must wake up, or we will find ourselves bowing to a monarchy of dark money and partisan judges.

You’ve made it this far, which means your brain hasn’t completely melted from the sheer incompetence of our leadership. Congratulations! Like, Share and Subcribe!

— Robert Cain, author of Democracy for Sale: How Corporate Greed Is Corrupting Democracy and Endangering the Planet.